Appeals & due process
Anyone can put a person on a list; few can show how they contest it
A barring notice issues with a tokenised appeal link — no account, no app. The grounds are routed to a reviewer who is not the person who lodged the ban, and the reviewer can uphold, vary, withdraw or reject with written reasons. Every step is timestamped and notified, and the whole appeal file exports as part of the licensing-review pack.
What it does
Tokenised, accountless lodgement
The barred person needs a link, not a login.
Enforced reviewer independence
Independence is applied by role in the database, not left to policy.
Four outcomes with reasons
Uphold, vary, withdraw or reject — each requiring written reasons that become part of the record.
Exportable appeal file
The full appeal history attaches to the compliance and licensing-review pack.
What that gets you
- The first question a regulator asks already has an answer
- Appeal outcomes feed back into register accuracy
- Retail and venue bans run the same process
